NEW Reviews Beta Feedback
Epson Stylus Photo RX620
70
Good
- Avg User Rating
- 5 User Reviews | add yours »
- Pros
- Prints detailed color photos
- Can scan film
- Cons
- Prints on plain paper looked abysmal
- Text looked fuzzy
- $129.99 - $279.94
- From 2 Merchants
PC World Editor's Review
by Paul Jasper
The RX620 prints beautiful photos and does a masterful job of scanning. But the device falters when printing text and graphics on plain paper.
The $300 Epson Stylus Photo RX620 works wonderfully for photographers, but it isn't well suited to an office environment. Though the unit scanned slides and negatives nicely, and produced beautiful prints on photo paper, the text and graphics output it printed on plain paper were among the worst we saw.
The RX620 uses a light in its lid to scan slides and negatives. Conveniently, the film adapter tucks away behind the reflective document mat in the lid when not in use. The lid comes off easily for scanning bulky media, such as large books.
The RX620 is the best-connected MFP of the nine we tested for the June 2005 chart. Its media-card slots accept all the major formats, and its direct-print port communicates with more than just PictBridge-compatible digital cameras: You can read and write images to such devices as Zip drives, CD/DVD burners, and USB flash drives. You can even plug a $69 Bluetooth adapter into the port and print from mobile devices such as camera phones and PDAs. The rear USB 2.0 port lets you speedily transfer images to your PC.
The angled control panel features a large (2.5-inch) color LCD surrounded by an intuitive set of buttons that have a pleasant rubbery feel. It's easy to preview images on the screen, perform simple editing tasks, and navigate the menus.
In our tests, the RX620 produced impressive scanning results, proving especially adept at picking out detail in color photographs. It previewed and scanned a 4-by-5-inch photo at 100 dpi in 18 seconds--4 seconds faster than the average for this group.
The six dye-based inks come in individual cartridges. Photos looked superb, with bright colors and good details in shadows, though many edges were slightly fuzzy compared to the output from other MFPs. Prints on plain paper, however, looked abysmal. The banding on our line art print reminded us of pajama stripes. Text looked fuzzy and even appeared to cast shadows in places; white dots were common in large, solid characters.
Even worse, the RX620 printed text at just 2.2 pages per minute, slower than any other MFP we tested, though color graphics printed at a relatively respectable 1.8 ppm. Copy speed lagged, too, at just 1.5 ppm; and the RX620's copies were the least-attractive ones produced the current batch of MFPs.
Upshot: The Epson Stylus Photo RX620 is a good choice for photographers who don't print on plain paper.
Paul Jasper
User Reviews for Epson Stylus Photo RX620
-
Reviewed by:
Duration of ownership:
Strengths: looks cool
Weaknesses: Just about every thing
Overall Evaluation: This printer is just what you want if you like to have junk sitting on your shelf. Today I was printing envelopes. Out of 97 envelopes, 46 had sections with blank patches. I might as well do it all by hand. This printer would have been pretty good back in 1900. It double feeds paper all the time. If you try to print front and back--have fun. It might take you 1hr for 20 sheets and 5 wasted pages. No good. Oh and by the way this printer is sloooooooooooooooooooooooww like very, very slow. A Canon may drink ink, but this printer is worse. I bought this over a month ago and haven't used it too much. Just had to change out the black ink tank. My Canon which I sadly got rid of after 3 yrs would go through a tank every 2 months, maybe and that was with constant use. My Canon was getting old and the Photo quality was deteriorating some so I got this epson. I was looking for something that would print better pictures and save on ink. It isn?t even worth printing pictures with. The pictures take about a day to dry and the quality isn?t near good.NEVER BUY AN EPSON
-
Reviewed by: bheckard
Duration of ownership:
Strengths: Excellent photo quality, when used with photo paper. Decent scans of negatives. Speed is fine for low-medium volume use. Good looking & compact.
Weaknesses: Can only scan slides & 35mm negatives- nothing larger. Has trouble feeding single sheets of standard paper. Cable not included. Scan resolution could be higher.
Overall Evaluation: This AIO is perfect for a home/small office user who has no faxing needs. The quality of the photos is outstanding for the price. You can also use Kodak's photo paper (cheaper) for the same results as Epson's paper. The unit is well-designed & fits easily into most areas. However, you load the paper from the back, so you'll want to place it somewhere that you can regularly access it. I compared this to Epson's RX700 & Canon's MP800; for the price after rebates, this was the best deal/feature set in the AIO market.
Latest Printers News, Reviews, How-To's
-
How to Buy a Printer What you print, and how much of it you print, should guide your buying decision. We explain how to choose a printer that's appropriate for your needs.
-
Review: Canon Pixma MP480 his basic all-in-one unit lacks some of the fancy features on some MFPs, but it's a very capable device in all of its functions.
-
HP Unveils Deskjet D2545 HP introduces an inexpensive ink-jet printer that's also environmentally friendly.
-
Top 5 Inkjet Printers All our recommended products cost between $50 and $130.
-
HP Photosmart D5460 Inkjet Printer Budget-minded photo enthusiasts will like the premium features tacked onto this unit's basic chassis.




